48% of SLUGs (a cohort of student associations we detailed earlier today) are represented by a woman president this year. Before a changeover of the student association president at Algonquin happened, it might have been 52%.
This is exciting news, and representation of women in the top echelons of the student union world is something we should celebrate. So let’s take a look at the last 5 years of SLUGs data and whether the president or president equivalent is a woman.
| School | 22-23 | 21-22 | 20-21 | 19-20 | 18-19 | %Women Last-5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guelph | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | 60% |
| Athabasca | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | 60% |
| U of A | No | No | No | Yes | No | 20% |
| U of C | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | 60% |
| SFU | No | No | Yes | No | No | 20% |
| FraserValleyU | No | – | Yes | – | – | 50% |
| UBC | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | 40% |
| BCIT | No | No | No | No | No | 0% |
| UManitoba | No | No | Yes | No | No | 20% |
| Queen’s | No | No | No | No | No | 0% |
| Carleton | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | 60% |
| McMaster | No | No | No | No | Yes | 20% |
| Waterloo | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | 40% |
| Ottawa | No | No | No | – | – | 0% |
| TMU | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | 40% |
| UofT | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 60% |
| York | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | 80% |
| Algonquin | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 80% |
| Centennial | Yes | No | No | No | No | 20% |
| Fanshawe | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | 40% |
| McGill | Yes | No | No | No | No | 20% |
| Laval | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | 40% |
| TOTAL | 48% | 33% | 44% | 30% | 30% |
This table was not made with the intent to misgender anyone or ignore the existence of non-binary executives, so if there’s a correction related to that or any other reason we need to correct data, let us know!
As we can see, 2022-23 was a banner year in representation, breaking the 50% barrier in the 25 associations we look at here, at least when elections occurred.
So, are we there yet? I think there are some things to consider when asking about gender equality in the presidential office.

First, and probably less importantly, it’s important to remember that universities and colleges are not 50-50 on attendance, nowadays more students tend to be women. So reaching that 50% isn’t actually representative of the candidate pool.
Second, and more important, is figuring out not just the ability to get elected, but the ability to succeed. Are women facing a harder time getting respect from stakeholders? Are they suffering from more mental health effects as a result of their presidency? These are important questions that are another dimension to representation.
So. 48%. That’s our figure today. Let’s see where we land in June. With that, we’re OFF.

Leave a comment